Lecture 6:  Integrity

 

APEGN Code

 

1. A professional engineer or geoscientist shall recognize that professional ethics are founded upon integrity, competence and devotion to service and to the advancement of human welfare. This concept shall guide the conduct of the professional engineer or geoscientist at all times.

 

Three Aspects of Integrity

Honesty

Confidentiality

Conflict of Interest

Conflict of interest:  not so much an aspect of integrity as a threat to it

 

America

Donald McCabe:  “students admitting to copying from another student on an examination doubled from 26% to 52% between 1996 and 1993. … The highest level of cheating is reported in the more vocationally oriented majors of business and engineering, the highest level being among business majors.” (124)

 

Australia

Forty-one per cent [of the students surveyed] have cheated in a test or exam and 81 per cent have plagiarised work, according to the first quantitative study of cheating in Australian universities.” (theage.com.au, Aug 2002)

 

Engineering students were more likely to cheat than students from other faculties, but were less likely to plagiarise.

 

Survey of 1000 students at 4 universities

 

Canada    

Data is not as good

Study at Mount Allison (NB)

907 students surveyed

18.6% admit plagiarizing

14% admit copying on a test (University Affairs, 2000)

Note:  American numbers are better at small schools.  Mount Allison has ~2200 students

 

Carleton University

“OTTAWA - A group of Carleton University students has been accused of cheating – on an ethics assignment.

 

Associate Dean Donald Russell said Tuesday about 30 engineering students had been assigned to write an essay on ethics. Instead of using original material, they plagiarized work they found on the Internet, he said.”  (CBC News Mar. 27, 2002)

 

Link to video report:http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/03/26/cheat020326

 

Reacting to Carleton

What should happen to those engineering students?

 

How should it affect their education?

 

How should it affect their career?

 

Ways of Misusing the Truth (119-121)

Lying

Deliberate Deception

Withholding Information

Failing to Adequately Promote the Dissemination of Information

Failure to Seek Out the Truth

Revealing Confidential or Proprietary Information

Allowing One’s Judgment to be Corrupted

 

What’s Wrong with Dishonesty?

Is it always wrong to  be dishonest?

 

‘Little white lies’

Try keeping a liar’s diary

1961 study revealed that 88% of doctors routinely would not tell terminally ill cancer patients that they had cancer. Attitudes have changed since.

 

Deontologists on Dishonesty

Deontologists typically take a hard line on dishonesty

 

In general, to lie or withhold information someone is fail to respect his or her autonomy (122)

 

3 Elements of Autonomous Action

 

Intention

Deliberately done

Freedom of Action

lack of coercion

availability of alternative options

Understanding

informed action

To lie to someone is to interfere with his understanding and, perhaps, his freedom of action

 

Consequentialists on Dishonesty

 

Consequentialists are generally less stringent than deontologists when it comes to dishonesty

 

Verdict depends on circumstances

Rule utilitarianism is less flexible

 

Confidentiality (pp.  132-4)

 

A professional engineer or geoscientist shall: …12. not disclose confidential information without the consent of his or her client or employer;

 

What if the confidential information is relevant to public safety?

 

 

The Duty to Report

 

A professional engineer or geoscientist shall: …14. present clearly to his or her clients or employers the consequences to be expected if his or her professional judgement is overruled by other authorities in matters pertaining to work for which he or she is professionally responsible. (APEGN Code)

 

What if the client does not act on this information?

 

The Limits of Confidentiality

 

Legally murky

No analogue to lawyer-client privilege

Comparison to physician’s duty of care

“When a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his professions should determine, that his patient presents a serious danger of violence to another, he incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim…” (134)

Note:  a U.S. ruling, but may have force in Canada

‘Whistleblower’ legislation

 

Conflict of Interest

 

“A professional engineer or geoscientist shall: …13. not undertake any assignment which may create a conflict of interest with his or her client or employer without a full knowledge of the client or employer;” (APEGN)

 

How far to take this?

Reveal all gifts, however, small?

 

Back