ISD II – Psychiatry
Ethics/Humanities/Health Law
Short Paper Topics
Remember that those of you who selected the option of writing short essays
during the ISD I & II course should submit your next essay by Jan. 31.
Below are some possible topics connected to issues in psychiatry.
1. Consider the case of Mr. A. as described in Walter Everaerd’s article
“A Case of Apotemnophilia.” Would it be morally wrong for a surgeon
to decide to perform the amputation that Mr. A. desires? What factors
need to be taken into account in order to decide this issue? If it
would be wrong to perform the surgery, what changes in the case of Mr. A.
would make it morally okay to carry out the surgery?
2. Thomas Szasz, a key figure in the ‘anti-psychiatry’ movement, famously
(or perhaps infamously) argues that mental illness is a “myth.” His
status as a critic of mainstream psychiatry has faded considerably since
the 1960s and 1970s when he was a quite well known figure. Nonetheless,
his challenge to mainstream ways of thinking about psychiatry is worth considering.
In “Involuntary Mental Hospitalization: A Crime Against Humanity,”
(on reserve) he argues that “it is improper to hospitalize anyone without
his consent” (p. 295). Critically evaluate Szasz’s argument.
What, if anything, is there to be learned from his view?
3. Although we often forget it, many of the diagnostic categories that psychiatrists
work with have not always been with us. Psychiatric conditions have
their own histories. In “Les Alienes Voyaguers: How Fugue
Became a Medical Entity,” (on reserve) the Canadian philosopher and historian
of science Ian Hacking describes a psychiatric condition, dissociative fugue,
that went in and out of fashion between the late 1800s and early 1900s.
Discuss the history Hacking offers of this condition. What, if anything,
does it have to teach us about the psychiatric categories we work with today?
4. In “Good Science or Good Business?” (on reserve) David Healy discusses
the huge commercial success of Prozac. Using this example, he argues
that the business interests of the “medico-pharmaceutical complex” sometimes
determine the categories and conditions psychiatrists work with. Discuss
and critically evaluate his argument.
You may also write on a topic of your own choosing provided it deals with
Ethics/Humanities/Health Law issues connected with psychiatry. Please
see either John Crellin or Andrew Latus to discuss a topic.